WASHINGTON (PAI)--In its only action between last week's two winter blizzards, the Senate yielded Feb. 9 to yet another Republican filibuster and killed Democratic President Barack Obama's nomination of union attorney Craig Becker to the National Labor Relations Board. No action was scheduled for Obama's other NLRB nominees, including Mark Pearce.
President Obama can still recess Craig Becker and Mark Pearce this week during the President's Day recess.
Click-to-Call to contact the White House switchboard and demand that President Obama defy Republican obstructionism and use his executive power to appoint Craig Becker and Mark Pearce, both highly qualified nominees, to the NLRB during the Presidents Day recess. Stick to these talking points:
President Obama needs to act to recess Craig Becker and Mark Pearce NOW! so that the NLRB can do its job.Working people are getting pushed aside and it's time to do something about it.For more than two years, the NLRB has had only TWO of its five members. Workers need an NLRB that can and will enforce the National Labor Relations Act and protect workers' rights - not an NLRB handicapped by vacancies. Obama's nominees, Becker and Pearce, are highly qualified, well-respected labor lawyers. They were nominated seven months ago. In a deal with Republicans, the Senate last Thursday confirmed 27 other appointees - but still nothing on the appointees who protect workers. Working people cannot be asked to take a back seat any longer.
Last week's vote drew denunciations from AFL-CIO President Richard L. Trumka and Service Employees President Andy Stern. Becker was a counsel for both labor groups. The National Association of Manufacturers, which led the opposition, gloated.
Senators voted 52-33 to end the debate on Becker's nomination, but Democrats needed 60 votes to cut off the GOP talkathon against him. Fifteen senators -- 4 Democrats, one Democratic-leaning independent and 10 Republicans -- were absent.
The other 31 Republicans and Sens. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., and Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., voted for the filibuster and against Becker. Nelson, echoing the NAM, accused Becker of "having an aggressive personal agenda" on labor law issues, based on Becker's writings as a law professor in Chicago and elsewhere.
The vote is important because the 5-person board has had only two members since the last day of 2007. It decides who -- and which groups of workers -- unions can represent, judges labor law-breaking complaints and settles jurisdictional disputes. With only two members, courts have split over if NLRB rulings from 2008 to now are legal.
"Working families deserve a fully staffed NLRB in order to win justice in the workplace," said TWU President James C. Little. "Craig Becker is a highly qualified nominee for the NLRB, and this Republican-led filibuster has now left working people at a major disadvantage."
"It is reprehensible that a minority in the Senate blocked an up-or-down vote on Becker,"
said AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka.
"Becker has an impressive 27-year record of advocating for and representing workers, especially low-wage workers. He is eminently qualified to hear and decide cases fairly for both workers and employers" on the NLRB. "This is yet another instance of Washington politics-as-usual that so frustrates the public," Trumka added.
Stern said the issue is bigger than Becker: That Republicans want to trash the Obama administration -- and the country with it. "The Republican Party and some Democrats would rather sit on their hands than serve" voters, Stern said.
"Becker is as qualified and brilliant a nominee as they come. But when it came time to voting to even debate his appointment, Congress forgot -- or ignored -- the needs of the people they were elected to serve, and thwarted the will of the majority of the Senate…What we saw was a clear signal that too many members of Congress are invested in the failure of this administration, and in turn, the failure of this country."